On Progress, Belonging, and the Right to Stay
There was a time
when the train passed through the neighborhood
without seeing it.
It carried workers elsewhere,
carried wealth elsewhere,
carried opportunity elsewhere,
while the people beside the tracks
learned how to make a home
from what the city had forgotten.
They opened small stores.
They raised children.
They painted walls with memory.
They spoke old languages
into the ears of new generations.
They cooked the foods
their grandparents carried across borders.
They worshiped, celebrated, mourned,
borrowed from one another,
watched one another's children,
and turned anonymous streets
into a neighborhood.
Then one day,
the city looked again.
The station became valuable.
The land became valuable.
The sidewalks became valuable.
The neighborhood became valuable.
And suddenly everyone wanted
what the people had been building
while no one was watching.
That is when progress faces
its oldest temptation:
to love the place
and forget the people.
For there is a strange injustice
in the modern city—
the poor are asked to endure
a neighborhood when it is neglected,
but are asked to leave
when it becomes desirable.
They breathe beside the highway
when the air is dirty.
They walk the broken sidewalk
when investment is absent.
They keep the corner store alive
when customers are few.
They remain through the difficult years.
And then prosperity arrives
carrying an eviction notice.
But there is another possibility.
There can be a station
where the train arrives
and the people remain.
Where development does not mean disappearance.
Where improvement does not require exile.
Where the rising value of the land
does not become the falling security
of the neighbor.
Where affordable housing is not charity
but continuity.
Where the small merchant
still unlocks the same door in the morning.
Where the grandmother
still recognizes the street.
Where the child still hears
the language of home
walking from the station.
Where the mural remains meaningful
because the people whose story it tells
are still there to explain it.
This is more than development.
It is the recovery of a principle:
those who carried the neighborhood
through its years of abandonment
should be allowed to inherit
its years of abundance.
Let the trains come.
Let the buildings rise.
Let the sidewalks widen.
Let the trees be planted.
Let investment flow.
Let the neglected neighborhood
finally receive what was withheld from it.
But do not improve the street
by removing its memory.
Do not beautify the neighborhood
by exiling its culture.
Do not increase the value of the land
by decreasing the security of the people.
Do not call it renewal
when those who endured yesterday
cannot afford tomorrow.
For the greatest achievement
of a transit station
is not how many people
it can bring into a neighborhood.
Perhaps it is also
how many people it allows
to remain rooted there.
And when the final train arrives
beneath the evening sky,
may the doors open
onto something greater than development:
a grandmother still sitting near her window,
a merchant still sweeping his doorway,
children still running through the plaza,
old languages still crossing new streets,
music still remembering where it came from,
and a community discovering
that progress has finally learned
to arrive
without asking anyone
to disappear.
Pastor Steven G. Lee
St. GMC Corps
August 25, 2026
No comments:
Post a Comment